I thought Man on Wire was
a very interesting movie. Although I like it, I feel like they drug it out to
be too long. I think they should have told about his previous events very
briefly, and then gotten to the point of the twin towers. He is a very animated
character; I think his accent helps his character. Just by listening to him
talk about it we can tell how passionate he is over this subject. It is insane
that the friends that helped him create this magnificent even are not even on
talking terms now because of what he did after the event. This proves that he
is obsessed with wire walking because he just threw away his lifelong friends
for some random girl. That part of the movie was very strange and surprising.
Although is it strange, I think that part of the story is needed to tell the
whole experience. This movie was created after 9/11 happened. I think they
avoided the 9/11 subject all together because it would have distracted the
viewers from the story. They would be giving a different story than they wanted
to by telling the emotions they had from 9/11. That could be another reason why
they didn’t include 9/11; maybe their emotions are too strong to talk about
what happened. He had signed his name at the top of one of the towers. Now his signature
is probably dust. That has to make him emotional because that is the only proof
they had besides the video and now that piece of evidence is gone forever.
Although it is hinted at, the destruction of the Twin Towers is so well-known that it doesn't need to be mentioned. Mentioning their destruction, I think, would have necessarily changed the tone and focus of the film.
ReplyDeleteWhere can you break this post into two or more paragraphs?